Apple and WhatsApp vs the UK government

9th July 2025

What matters more, privacy or security?

Earlier this year it was revealed that the UK government requested that Apple provided backdoor access to encrypted iCloud data – including photos, notes, messages and device backups – under the Investigatory Powers Act. The government made this request for national security purposes: this data could be used to combat serious crimes.

Apple promptly refused. They argued that such backdoors could compromise the security of all users, making them more vulnerable to attack. The ability to access encrypted data could theoretically be used by bad actors, and Apple was unwilling to take the risk. As a result, Apple removed Advanced Data Protection (ADP) features for UK users and filed a legal challenge against the UK government.

This is where WhatsApp stepped in. They had criticised the UK government’s data privacy legislation before, and they spoke up again to support Apple, arguing that what the UK is asking for could set a dangerous precedent of governments requesting citizens’ private data.

Across the globe, various factions have reacted to the news: in the US, some officials viewed it as a violation of privacy, with some US politicians reconsidering intelligence sharing with the UK if such requests continue. The Open Rights Group warned that the UK’s action could undermine global digital privacy and security.

While the UK government’s request – in theory – is one that makes sense, and is intended to help protect people, ultimately it is hard not to agree with Apple. The breach of privacy and the potential risks something like this would lead to are significant, and that price outweighs the positives.

We advise that everyone keep a close eye on this case, as the decision may have a massive impact, particularly on those in the UK who use Apple or Meta (who own WhatsApp) products.

How would you feel if the government could access your personal data? Talk to Interfuture Systems about your thoughts on data privacy.